DOJ requests federal judge orders Texas to remove Rio Grande barriers in 10 days, citing safety hazards and international treaty violations.
The department is also seeking an injunction blocking Texas from erecting future river barriers without prior approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Conservative Group Sues Colorado Democrats Over Secret Survey
“Texas’s deployment of the Floating Barrier has caused significant and ongoing harm to the United States’ foreign relations with Mexico,” the filing said, adding that Mexican officials have raised their concerns “at the highest diplomatic levels.”
“Mexico has specifically asserted that Texas’s actions contravene various treaty obligations and has raised humanitarian concerns regarding possible loss of life to persons swimming in the Rio Grande,” the filing said.
The federal government asked Texas officials to remove the barrier on July 20, about ten days after it was installed near Eagle Pass to deter migrants from crossing the river. In a reply letter, Abbott refused, saying, “Texas will see you in court, Mr. President.”
The Justice Department obliged, suing Texas in Austin federal court Monday, then following up Wednesday with a request for a court order requiring the barrier’s removal.
The lawsuit argued that the barrier violated the Rivers and Harbors Act, which prohibits the obstruction of U.S. waterways and was not approved by the bilateral International Boundary and Water Commission, as required by a 1970 treaty.
Other statements included within the filing raised specific concerns.
Gov. Greg Abbott dares the Biden Administration to take him to court over new barriers along the Rio Grande River on the Texas/Mexico border.
Hillary Quam, the U.S.-Mexico border coordinator for the U.S. State Department, said Mexican officials had protested the river barrier as a violation of treaties dating back to 1848.
“If the barrier is not removed expeditiously, its presence will have an adverse impact on U.S. foreign policy, including our relationship with the government of Mexico,” Quam wrote in an affidavit accompanying the filing.
Mexico also has raised humanitarian concerns, she said.
“Mexico is concerned that individuals swimming in the river may get caught in the floating barrier and risk injury or even death. Such an injury … could quickly rise to a significant international incident,” Quam wrote.
Another affidavit from Jason Owens, chief of the U.S. Border Patrol, said the 39-mile stretch of river that includes the barrier is dangerous, requiring 249 water-related rescues and resulting in 89 deaths since 2018.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: US Government Passes Landmark Crypto Bill, A Significant Victory For The Industry
“Any obstructions in the water could naturally impair the freedom of movement and potentially delay response times,” Owens wrote.
Coast Guard officials also described potential threats to operations, citing a need to assess how the barrier could impact the river’s navigability.
